Maya Stern
Project delivery manager at CN
reliable developers
TEC is a software company that specialises in building high-performance digital platforms for sports and live events. With over 250 experts across Europe and more than a decade of proven delivery, we combine engineering excellence with deep industry knowledge to create solutions that perform when it matters most.
Our expertise spans the full digital lifecycle: solution architecture, custom platform development, advanced testing, automation, and experience optimisation. As a Microsoft partner and ISO-certified organisation, we provide technical reliability alongside enterprise-grade standards of security and quality.
TEC at a Glance
This profile is managed by TEC Spo****************************************** (m**************@gmail.com)
Above Average: TEC's profile gives buyers a credible starting point, but important evidence still needs checking before commitment. Five listed services suggest coverage across several delivery areas, while 46 focus entries indicate broad stated technical or capability interests; the available details name neither services nor focus areas, so buyers cannot tell whether TEC is full-cycle, full-stack, or specialized. The portfolio has four cases, enough to inspect but not to establish broad delivery depth. One 5-star review is positive but anecdotal. TEC was recognized in the 2025 TechBehemoths Awards, a useful signal from one edition. Its stated client range runs from starting-to-scale firms through enterprise, and its 250-999 person team suggests substantial capacity. A manager has claimed the profile, but not through a domain-verified business email; verify key details and request references and comparable case studies. One listed account manager is the only contact signal, so confirm project communication and escalation arrangements before proceeding.
The profile has one review with a 5-star average. That is a positive individual account, but a single review is anecdotal evidence and cannot establish a reliable pattern across projects or clients. Buyers should not treat the rating as a strong indicator of likely outcomes. Ask for references from clients with comparable needs and assess how TEC handled scope, communication, and delivery before relying on this signal.
TEC was recognized in the 2025 TechBehemoths Awards. Recognition in one edition is a useful platform signal, but it does not establish a track record across multiple years or prove fit for a specific project. Buyers can take it as added context when comparing providers, while still evaluating relevant work and references directly. The profile shows a single award edition, so this should carry less weight than evidence of comparable delivery.
A manager has claimed the profile, but it is not verified through a business email matching TEC's website domain. That is better than an unmaintained, unclaimed listing, but it does not provide the strongest confirmation that the company stands behind every profile detail. Buyers should verify essential information, including current services and contact details, independently before relying on it for a project decision.
TEC's expanded company description gives buyers more orientation than a bare profile, but length alone does not establish how clearly it explains the company's expertise, methods, or results. It can help frame an initial conversation, yet the available evidence does not show whether it gives concrete examples or distinguishes TEC's strengths. Treat it as a starting point, not proof of delivery. Before shortlisting, ask which capabilities are most relevant to your project and request examples that demonstrate them.
Four published cases give buyers some direct evidence of delivered work, but the portfolio remains thin for judging range or repeatability. The cases may help establish relevance if they match your project, but the available profile data does not describe their scope or outcomes. Buyers cannot infer broad delivery capability from four examples alone. Review each case for comparable requirements and results, and request additional relevant case studies before shortlisting if the published work does not closely match your needs.
The supporting picture is led by TEC's 46 focus entries and broad client positioning, spanning starting-to-scale businesses through enterprise. The clearest gaps are the lack of platform articles and limited account coverage, with one listed manager; industry breadth is present but its relevance cannot be checked from the available details. Seven of eight supporting components are filled, so the profile offers a substantial outline, but buyers still need to verify specific expertise and project-fit evidence directly.
TEC has one office.
One Office
Where TEC's expertise concentrates - services, technologies, and which clients they fit best.
Services provided
Focus(%)
Benchmarked against every other company in Romania. See exactly where TEC ranks.
How TEC compares to other companies based on profile strength?
See how TEC is positioned among 506 companies from Romania based on profile strength. An above-average rate means the company has all it needs to deliver a project.
TEC’s 5.0 rests on just 1 review, so it is anecdotal, not a dependable pattern. The sole review dates to 2025 and gives 5 stars across the overall, quality, budget and schedule ratings, with none below 4; the TechBehemoths/imported source split is not provided. Its recent date adds relevance, but the volume keeps the score’s weight low.
The project delivery manager describes reliability as the basis of a long-running software development relationship. That is one client’s account, not evidence of a recurring strength; ask TEC for a reference from a comparable software project to check reliability over time.
Maya Stern
Project delivery manager at CN
reliable developers
Reach TEC directly and describe your project below.
Would you hire TEC?