Team Extension® is a Swiss partner for Fortune 500 and enterprise teams when hiring cannot keep up and delivery cannot slip. We ramp vetted experts in record time, from one specialist to full squads, and we integrate into your tools, standards, and governance.
We focus on practical AI and automation: productionizing AI features, building reliable data pipelines, putting MLOps basics in place, and automating workflows end to end, including with n8n. Alongside that, we support enterprise software delivery across new development and long term maintenance, including integrations, refactoring, performance, reliability, and upgrades.
Team Extension at a Glance
This profile is managed by Moe Jam* (s****@teamextension.io)
The profile is rated Average: it gives buyers useful positioning signals, but not enough direct delivery evidence for a confident shortlist. The company lists 7 services and 47 focus entries, indicating broad coverage, but the available details name neither services nor technologies, so buyers cannot map the stack from this profile alone. Its strongest fit signals are stated enterprise and mid-market clients, a 50-249 person company, 2 offices, and 6 industries. The 5-star average across 4 reviews is positive but still a limited sample. No portfolio cases or TechBehemoths Award editions are recorded, leaving little direct work evidence here. The profile is manager-claimed but not domain-verified, with one account manager listed. Worth considering, but request relevant case studies and references, confirm the proposed team and service coverage, and verify profile details before committing.
The profile has 4 reviews with a 5-star average. That is an encouraging rating, but the volume is still emerging rather than substantial, so it offers a limited basis for judging consistency across projects. Buyers can treat the reviews as a positive initial signal, not as proof that results will transfer to their own engagement. Check review details for relevance to your requirements and seek independent references for comparable work.
No TechBehemoths Award editions are recorded on the profile, so platform awards provide no recognition signal to weigh in this assessment. That absence is common among companies that do not actively engage with the platform and does not establish anything about delivery quality. Buyers should base their view on the available project evidence, client references, and scope fit rather than expecting awards to validate the choice.
The profile is claimed by a manager, but it is not verified through a business email matching the company’s website domain. That gives buyers a named point of profile ownership, but not the strongest confirmation that the company formally stands behind these details. Verify current services, office information, and project contacts directly before relying on the listing; domain verification would provide a clearer accountability signal.
The company description is classified as moderate in length, so it gives buyers more orientation than a bare listing but does not, by length alone, establish what the team does best or how it works. The available profile information provides no specific description details to verify its expertise or approach. Treat this as a useful starting point, not evidence of delivery capability; compare its claims with relevant case studies and ask for a project-specific explanation before shortlisting.
There are no published portfolio cases on the profile. Buyers therefore have no direct examples here to judge the team’s delivered work, technical choices, or relevance to a proposed project. This is a major evidence gap, not proof of weak delivery, but it leaves little for a buyer to evaluate before contact. Request recent case studies matched to your scope, including the company’s role, outcomes, and client references, before committing to a shortlist.
The supporting picture is strongest in the company’s 47 focus entries and its stated fit for enterprise and mid-market clients. It also identifies a 50-249 person company, but that scale does not show how a project team would be staffed. The clearest weakness is the single listed account manager, while the profile has no platform contributions. With 7 of 8 supporting fields filled, the picture is mostly populated but thin on direct delivery evidence and inquiry coverage.
Team Extension has 2 offices. The head office is in Genève, Switzerland.
2 Offices
Team Extension’s record is promising but emerging: 4.8 from 4 reviews across 2020-2022, so one new review could move the score. Three are 5-star and one is 4.5; none falls below 4. The TechBehemoths/imported split is not supplied, and the newest review is from 2022, so this is a dated signal with unclear source mix.
Most reviewers praise communication; a few also note reliability and adaptability, with feedback covering music and mobile-app work as well as website improvements. One reviewer flags the minimum contract time commitment as a possible constraint. Reviews support positive software delivery, but do not establish performance on the company’s stated $50,000+ enterprise engagements; ask for a recent reference on a comparable project and contract commitment.
Arne Bialas
Other
sources
The dedication with which the Team Extension contributed has pleased us very much and led to the project's success.
Team Extension’s efforts have been met with positive acclaim, improving the website's speed, design, and security. The team is professional, knowledgeable, and effective in prioritizing and coordinating tasks through Slack and GitHub.
Louis Napoletani
Other
sources
Their ability to adapt to changing situations and environments is quite unique!
The partner is delighted by Team Extension's remarkable mobile app output. The healthy relationship during the creation of the platform ultimately factored in the decision of the client to continue working with the group for further developments. They are communicative, reliable, and talented.
Anonymous
Other
sources
There was passion and love in the work they delivered for us.
Since the Team Extension helped with the project, the music app became number one in the client's country. They are efficient, effective, and reliable. What stood out the most is their ability to adapt and care deeply for the company's project.
Giulio Pengo
Other
sources
Professionalism is easily perceivable in all of Team Extension activities.
Team Extension was communicative throughout the process, which was indicative of their professional attitude. While their minimum time commitment per contract could be a limitation for some, the team was willing to discuss a price point that made sense for the client.
Where Team Extension's expertise concentrates - services, technologies, and which clients they fit best.
Benchmarked against every other company in Switzerland. See exactly where Team Extension ranks.
How Team Extension compares to other companies based on profile strength?
See how Team Extension is positioned among 145 companies from Switzerland based on profile strength. An average rating is fine, but could definitely be better for a bit more credibility.
A portfolio is the only direct evidence of work this company has actually delivered. Without one, you cannot verify quality, style, or scope before committing budget. We recommend prioritizing companies with a documented track record, or requesting work samples directly before proceeding.
Reach Team Extension directly and describe your project below.
Would you hire Team Extension?
