Pixels
No Reviews Yet
Pixels is a group of digital agencies focused on innovation and multichannel marketing. Pixels is based in Geneva and active since 2011.
Our services include Omnichannel Engagement Strategy, Creative and Content Creation, and Digital Expertise.
The group also includes specialized communication agencies:
- Pixels Health (www.pixelshealth.com) focuses on healthcare.
- Pixels Banking (www.pixelsbanking.com) focuses on banking and finance.
Specific to our healthcare branch:
Pixels Health offers medical writing services. We are certified IQVIA, VEEVA, Salesforce, Adobe, and ISO 27001. Some of our references: Sanofi, Merck, Pierre-Fabre, Servier, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Diabetes patient association and multiple start-ups and SME.
Pixels at a Glance
This profile is managed by Léo**** Gai***** (l***************@pixelstrade.com)
Pixels is Below Average as a buyer-facing profile: it gives too little direct evidence of delivered work to support a shortlist on profile evidence alone. The profile lists 5 services but does not name them, and has 4 focus entries without identifying technologies, so buyers cannot judge delivery layers or confirm a full-cycle or full-stack offer. Client positioning spans starting-to-scale businesses through enterprise, while the team is listed at 10-49 people. A TechBehemoths Award in 2024 adds recognition, but there are no portfolio projects or reviews to validate delivery. The profile is manager-claimed, not domain-verified, and lists 1 account manager. No platform dates are available to establish listing tenure. Request relevant case studies, client references, verification of current profile details, and the team proposed for the work before engaging.
Pixels has no reviews on the profile and no average rating to assess. With no client feedback, buyers cannot use this signal to judge past working relationships or compare reported experiences with other providers. This absence says nothing about performance, but it leaves a meaningful evidence gap. Request references from clients whose projects resemble yours before moving forward.
Pixels is a TechBehemoths Award winner in the 2024 edition, giving buyers a concrete platform-recognition signal for that year. The profile shows recognition in one edition, not a track record across multiple years, so the award offers limited evidence on its own. Treat it as useful context, not a substitute for portfolio work or client references when assessing fit.
A manager has claimed the profile, but it is not verified through a business email matching the company’s website domain. That provides some account ownership, but not the strongest available confirmation that the company stands behind the listed details. Buyers should verify essential information, including the current service offer and contact details, independently before relying on them.
The detailed company description gives buyers a useful account of Pixels’ expertise and approach, which is stronger orientation than a bare service listing. It remains a statement of intent, not evidence of delivered results. With no portfolio projects or reviews on the profile, buyers cannot use this description to verify how the company has applied that expertise. Treat it as a starting point, then request case studies relevant to the work you are considering.
The profile shows no portfolio projects, leaving buyers with no direct examples of Pixels’ delivered work to assess for relevance, scope or results. This is the clearest gap in the evidence available for shortlisting. Ask for case studies that match your project type and clarify the company’s role in each; without those examples, the profile alone cannot establish delivery fit.
The strongest supporting signals are broad client positioning and five listed services, which suggest a wide intended market and offer. Their names are not available here, so buyers cannot judge the actual service fit. The profile’s weakest signals are its 10-49 person team size and one listed account manager; no platform contributions are published. Seven of the eight supporting components are filled, but the overall picture remains limited where buyers most need proof and clear delivery detail.
Locations
Pixels has one office.
One Office
Company Speciality
Where Pixels' expertise concentrates - services, technologies, and which clients they fit best.
Services provided
Focus(%)
Focuses & Technologies
Client Focus
- 45% - Enterprise (>$10M)
- 25% - General partnership ($200k - $500k)
- 10% - Small Business ($500k - $1M)
- 10% - Mid-market ($1M - $10M)
- 10% - Starting to scale (<$200K)
Industry Focus
- Health Care & Medical50%
- Information technology50%
How Pixels compares with other companies in Switzerland
Benchmarked against every other company in Switzerland. See exactly where Pixels ranks.
How Pixels compares to other companies based on profile strength?
See how Pixels is positioned among 145 companies from Switzerland based on profile strength. A below-average rating is tricky. It might be that they are still good, but not paying too much attention to their business profile.
See the work before you reach out.
A portfolio is the only direct evidence of work this company has actually delivered. Without one, you cannot verify quality, style, or scope before committing budget. We recommend prioritizing companies with a documented track record, or requesting work samples directly before proceeding.
Reviews
Reviews are a company's track record with real clients. Without any, you're relying on their own claims and portfolio alone, there's no independent confirmation of how they actually perform. This isn't necessarily a red flag on its own, but it is added risk. Weigh it against their portfolio and EXO Score, or consider a company with a proven review history.
Contact the company directly
Reach Pixels directly and describe your project below.
Would you hire Pixels?