TechBehemoths
Submit Project Sign in
Interactive Design Service Logo

Interactive Design Service 

No Reviews Yet

Write the First Review
Founding Year 2021
Team Size 50-249
Hourly Rate $ $ $ $ $

InterActive Design Service is now the most trending and the best web design and development services company in the USA.

This is the team of most professional website designers and web developers in the USA. If anyone wants to promote his business by online appearance so the interactivedesignservice.com is the best choice to make the website and gain some positive vibes by appearing business online. who are best in designing and developing websites.

They will design and develop your website exactly according to your needs. And our service is too fast and according to the client's need.

This profile is managed by Int******** Des**********  (s*****@interactivedesignservice.com)

Last online: over a year agoResponse Unlikely
EXO ScoreEXO Score
OVERALL SCORE
27
Poor
0/100
Reviews
0/100
Awards
50
Claimed
60/100
Description
0/100
Portfolio
52/100
Other
EXO Score Summary

The public verdict is Poor: this profile gives buyers limited evidence to judge delivery or make a confident shortlist decision. It lists 5 services, but the service names are not available here; only 1 focus area is listed, with no technology names supplied. Buyers cannot tell what the company builds or how its technical stack maps to a project. The enterprise client focus, above $10 million in revenue, and a 50-249 person team indicate a larger-client positioning. But there are no portfolio cases, 0 reviews, and no TechBehemoths Awards. A manager has claimed the profile, but it is not domain-verified; only 1 account manager is listed. These gaps leave little here to verify. Request relevant case studies, client references, named technologies, and company verification before engaging.

Reviews Summary

The profile has 0 reviews, so there is no customer rating or review history to weigh. This leaves buyers without public feedback on client experience and means no positive or negative conclusion about delivery can be drawn from this signal. Before engaging, ask for references from clients with comparable needs and speak with them directly. Reviews may be absent because a company does not actively use this platform, but that does not replace independent evidence for a significant project.

Awards Summary

There are no TechBehemoths Awards listed, so platform recognition adds no evidence to this profile. Awards are only one signal and their absence does not establish anything about delivery quality; it simply leaves buyers without this form of recognition to consider. The profile provides no award-edition history that could be weighed against its other evidence. Base a shortlist decision on relevant case studies, client references, and a clear account of the team’s experience instead.

Claimed Summary

A manager has claimed the profile, but it is not verified through a business email matching the company’s website domain. That gives buyers a point of contact, but not the strongest confirmation that the company stands behind the profile information. Verify the listed services, company details, and project claims directly before relying on them. The distinction matters because the profile is manager-claimed, not domain-verified; it should not be treated as independently confirmed company information.

Description Summary

The profile has a moderate-length company description, so buyers get more than a name and a bare listing. Length alone does not show whether it explains the company’s expertise, delivery approach, or the work it is best suited to handle. Those details cannot be established from the available profile evidence. Treat the description as a starting point, not proof of capability; ask for a concise account of the team’s relevant experience and how it would approach your project before relying on this signal.

Portfolio Summary

There are no published portfolio cases. Buyers therefore have no project examples on this profile to assess the company’s work, sector relevance, or delivery scope. This is a major gap in the closest available evidence of delivery, not evidence that the company lacks experience. Before shortlisting, request case studies that match your project, including the company’s role, the work delivered, and outcomes the client can verify. Without that material, the profile gives little basis for comparing its delivery record with other options.

Other Summary

The clearest supporting signals are the enterprise client focus and a list of 5 services, which give buyers some indication of intended market and offering breadth. The profile is weaker on specialist focus and has only 1 account manager; its missing contribution signal adds no published insight. With 7 of 8 supporting areas filled, the picture is mostly populated but not especially informative about technical fit or delivery. Ask for named specialisms, relevant cases, and a clear project contact plan.

Shortlists work better when you're signed in!

Sign in or create a free account to save companies and keep them synced across your devices.

Locations

Interactive Design Service has one office.

One Office

Company Speciality

Where Interactive Design Service's expertise concentrates - services, technologies, and which clients they fit best.

Focuses & Technologies

Client Focus

  • 7% - Enterprise (>$10M)

Industry Focus

  • Advertising & marketing
    6%

How Interactive Design Service compares with other companies in United States

Benchmarked against every other company in United States. See exactly where Interactive Design Service ranks.

How Interactive Design Service compares to other companies based on profile strength?

The profile carries a Poor information label, placing it in the lower tier of the Alameda comparison. Local profiles cluster around Poor and Below Average, with fewer at Average; countrywide, Poor and Very Poor are also common. This is not an unusual outlier, but it does not distinguish the profile for buyers seeking fuller evidence.For a shortlist, treat this as a material evidence gap: buyers will find less to assess here than on stronger-labeled alternatives. The label says nothing by itself about delivery quality. Request case studies, team credentials, client references and clear service details before comparing fit. A recently listed or lightly maintained profile is one possible explanation, but the evidence still needs to be supplied.

How much does Interactive Design Service charge for their services compared to other companies in United States and Alameda?

The disclosed rate is below $30/hour, placing Interactive Design Service at the budget end of the United States market. Alameda's disclosed rate points include $29-$30/hour as well as higher levels; national disclosures also span low rates through $70/hour and $150/hour. The profile does not state an exact figure within its under-$30 range, so its precise position against the lowest-priced peers is unclear.This is a budget-fit signal, not a quality ranking. Confirm the actual rate, what work it covers and whether minimum engagement terms or additional fees apply before setting a like-for-like budget. The disclosed rate may fit a cost-sensitive brief, but it does not establish scope or total project cost.

How many services does Interactive Design Service provide compared to other companies?

With 1 service listed, Interactive Design Service is unusually focused against Alameda profiles that publish service lists: local listings include portfolios at five and ten services, while some list none. Countrywide, the common nonzero portfolio also starts at five services, with a long tail of broader lists. This profile therefore sits below the typical published breadth, not in the middle of the market.That narrow scope may make the company a specialist candidate, but the listing alone does not establish depth or suitability. Ask for relevant project examples, the specific work covered and how adjacent needs would be handled. If the brief spans several disciplines, the profile offers little evidence of coverage; if it is tightly defined, probe the listed focus rather than treating breadth as a quality measure.

When was Interactive Design Service founded?

Founded in 2021, Interactive Design Service is recently established relative to the full United States distribution, which includes companies founded across many decades. Its date sits within a dense recent cohort: company counts rise sharply from the 1990s through the 2010s and remain substantial into the 2020s. Alameda-specific comparison data is unavailable, so its local tenure position cannot be verified.This profile shows a short verifiable company history, not a verdict on capability. Buyers should assess the team's relevant project record, including work completed before the company's founding if applicable, and verify who would deliver the engagement. The recent date is a tenure fact to weigh against the brief's need for organizational track record, not a reason on its own to exclude the provider.

See the work before you reach out.

No Portfolio Yet

A portfolio is the only direct evidence of work this company has actually delivered. Without one, you cannot verify quality, style, or scope before committing budget. We recommend prioritizing companies with a documented track record, or requesting work samples directly before proceeding.

Reviews

No Reviews Yet
Write the First Review for Interactive Design Service

Reviews are a company's track record with real clients. Without any, you're relying on their own claims and portfolio alone, there's no independent confirmation of how they actually perform. This isn't necessarily a red flag on its own, but it is added risk. Weigh it against their portfolio and EXO Score, or consider a company with a proven review history.

Contact the company directly

Reach Interactive Design Service directly and describe your project below.

Would you hire Interactive Design Service?