TechBehemoths
Submit Project Sign in
TechBehemoths
Sign in
DiMassimo Goldstein Logo

DiMassimo Goldstein

New York ,  United States
5.0
1 Review
Founding Year 1997
Team Size 50-249
Hourly Rate $ $ $ $ $

Recognized by Advertising Age as a Small Agency of the Year (2014, Gold, Northeast) and by Inc. magazine as one of the 5000 fastest growing companies in America, DiMassimo Goldstein is an independent micro-network of advertising, design and communications agencies. We inspire action in people, brands and businesses.

This profile is managed by TechBehemoths. Working here? Claim this profile

EXO ScoreEXO Score
OVERALL SCORE
24
Poor
60/100
Reviews
0/100
Awards
0
Claimed
40/100
Description
0/100
Portfolio
43/100
Other
EXO Score Summary

DiMassimo Goldstein’s Poor profile gives buyers too little evidence to justify an inquiry on profile strength alone. Five listed services suggest breadth, but no service names or technical focus are supplied, so buyers cannot see what it builds or how much of the stack it covers. Delivery proof is absent: there are no portfolio cases, and the sole review is a 5-star rating from 1 reviewer, an anecdotal signal rather than a dependable pattern. No TechBehemoths Award recognition is listed. The profile is unclaimed, with no account managers, so verify its details and request relevant case studies, references and a named contact before shortlisting. Its stated 50-249 person team and client range from small business to enterprise indicate potential fit across scales, but do not establish experience at any tier. Three industries and one location are listed, without names here; platform tenure cannot be assessed from the supplied dates.

Reviews Summary

The profile shows a 5-star rating from 1 review. That is a positive but anecdotal signal, not a dependable pattern across clients; the single review carries too little weight to establish consistent satisfaction. Buyers should not treat the rating alone as validation of fit or delivery. Ask for references from clients with comparable needs and assess their experience alongside the project evidence, which is absent from the profile.

Awards Summary

No TechBehemoths Award recognition is listed. This is an absent platform-recognition signal, not evidence about delivery quality, and it gives buyers no award track record to use when comparing providers. The profile also supplies no dates that would explain how long the company has been listed. Buyers should place more weight on direct evidence: request relevant case studies and client references rather than treating the absence of awards as a performance verdict.

Claimed Summary

This profile is unclaimed, with no company manager listed, so nobody at the company maintains it through the platform. Its details may be stale, and buyers should verify essential information independently before relying on it. The profile does not provide dates that would help establish how current its information is. Confirm the company’s services, team and contact details directly, and request a named point of contact before proceeding.

Description Summary

The company description is classified as short, so buyers get little explanation of its expertise, working approach or strongest capabilities. That leaves the profile unable to establish what DiMassimo Goldstein does particularly well; the five listed services provide only a count, not usable detail. Treat the description as an incomplete orientation, not evidence of delivery. Before shortlisting, ask for a concise account of its core work and how it approaches projects like yours.

Portfolio Summary

There are no published portfolio cases, so buyers cannot inspect any of the company’s actual work on this profile. This is a major gap in the closest available evidence of delivery: there is no basis here to judge relevance, execution or the kinds of outcomes it has produced. The absence does not establish poor performance, but it leaves the profile unable to support a shortlist decision. Request relevant case studies, including the company’s role and measurable results, before engaging.

Other Summary

The strongest supporting signals are the stated client range, spanning small business through enterprise, and a listed set of 5 services. The profile’s industry mapping is limited to 3 entries, while its 50-249 person team gives scale but not project-level capacity. Technical focus, account contacts and platform contributions are missing. With only 5 of 8 supporting components filled, buyers have some positioning information but too little practical evidence to judge fit without asking for specifics.

Visit Website

Shortlists work better when you're signed in!

Sign in or create a free account to save companies and keep them synced across your devices.

Locations

DiMassimo Goldstein has one office.

One Office

Company Speciality

Where DiMassimo Goldstein's expertise concentrates - services, technologies, and which clients they fit best.

Services provided

Focus(%)

100%

Client Focus

  • 40% - Small Business ($500k - $1M)
  • 40% - Mid-market ($1M - $10M)
  • 20% - Enterprise (>$10M)

Industry Focus

  • Advertising & marketing
    45%
  • Media
    30%
  • Financial services
    25%

How DiMassimo Goldstein compares with other companies in United States

Benchmarked against every other company in United States. See exactly where DiMassimo Goldstein ranks.

How DiMassimo Goldstein compares to other companies based on profile strength?

DiMassimo Goldstein's profile is rated Poor, a lower label in New York, where most profiles cluster in poor, very poor, or below-average ratings. Higher labels are held by a smaller share of local providers. The country distribution shows the same broad pattern, so this is not an unusually low result for the market, but it leaves buyers with less profile information than better-rated alternatives.This rating measures the strength of information published on the profile, not service quality. Buyers shortlisting the firm should request the essentials directly, including relevant case studies, team experience, and service details. A limited or unmaintained profile is one possible explanation; the rating alone does not establish how the firm performs.

How much does DiMassimo Goldstein charge for their services compared to other companies in United States and New York?

DiMassimo Goldstein discloses an hourly range of $150-$250. In New York, this starts above the market's most common lower-rate point and reaches the higher end, where fewer profiles are positioned; the country distribution has the same broad shape. The range therefore places the firm above budget pricing and across mid-market to premium territory, rather than at the low-cost end.For buyers, this is a fit-and-budget signal, not a quality ranking. The upper end may exceed a typical local budget, while the lower end provides a point for comparison with mid-market options. Confirm which rate applies to the required team and scope before comparing proposals; the profile rate alone does not establish total project cost or value.

How many services does DiMassimo Goldstein provide compared to other companies?

DiMassimo Goldstein lists 5 services, placing its profile at the focused end of the New York market. Many local profiles list no services, while published offerings also extend into broader tiers, including 10 or more. The country distribution follows a similar pattern: five is a compact list, not an unusually broad portfolio.That focus can make the firm worth examining for depth in its stated areas, but the count does not show how much capability sits behind each service. Buyers should compare the listed areas with their brief and ask for specific examples of relevant work. A longer list elsewhere is not evidence of stronger delivery; breadth needs to be verified service by service.

When was DiMassimo Goldstein founded?

DiMassimo Goldstein was founded in 1997. New York founding-year data is unavailable, so the country distribution is the relevant comparison: the largest cohorts were founded from the late 1990s onward, with especially dense groups in the 2000s and 2010s. The firm predates those largest cohorts and is long-established relative to the broader market, though it is not among the earliest-founded providers shown.This gives buyers more operating history to examine than a recently founded profile would, but tenure does not prove quality or current relevance. For a shortlist, check how that history connects to the present team, the work most relevant to your brief, and results from comparable engagements. The founding date is useful context, not a substitute for current evidence.

See the work before you reach out.

No Portfolio Yet

A portfolio is the only direct evidence of work this company has actually delivered. Without one, you cannot verify quality, style, or scope before committing budget. We recommend prioritizing companies with a documented track record, or requesting work samples directly before proceeding.

Reviews

Reviews summary

DiMassimo Goldstein’s record is a perfect 5.0 from 1 review, dated 2019. That is anecdotal, not a pattern, and the review is dated; the platform split is not specified, and its brief title gives little evidence about delivery.

There is no recurring client theme to assess from one short review, and it does not substantiate the agency’s advertising, media planning or brand-building work. Before engaging, ask for a recent reference on a comparable campaign and budget.

5.0

From 1 Review

The reviews are collected on TechBehemoths, Google, Trustpilot and other resources.

5
4
3
2
1
Sort by: Relevance

Rebecca Weiser Greenberg

5.0on 05/09/2019
Inspiring Action!

Contact the company directly

Reach DiMassimo Goldstein directly and describe your project below.

Would you hire DiMassimo Goldstein?